Selasa, 13 Juni 2017

Questions in an Interview



A list of  20 Questions in an Interview
1.      Can you tell me a little about yourself?
2.      Why do you choosed English Literature in University?
3.      Who is paid you study?
4.      Who is paid you study?
5.      How did you hear about the position?
6.      What do you know about the company?
7.      Why do you want this job?
8.      What are your gratest professional strengths?
9.      Except formal academic, do you have other skills?
10.  What is the meaning of working for you?
11.  Tell me about a challenge or conflict you’ve faced at work, and how you dealt with it?
12.  What’s your dream job?
13.  What  are you looking for in a new position?
14.  What type of work environment do you prefer?
15.   How do you deal with pressure or stressful situations?
16.  What is advantage and disadvantage in work for you?
17.  Do you have good relation with your friends?
18.  Do you like working by yourself or by team?
19.  Why should we hire you?
20.  Where do you see yourself in five years?

Illegal question
a.      applicants about:
  • age
  • race
  • color
  • gender
  • national origin
  • birthplace
  • marital/parental/family status
  • religion
  • disabilities
Because the face serious trouble if they follow discriminatory about  recruitment policies. Laws stop interviewers from invading the interviewee  privacy, but sensitive questions still arise in one form or another inside job interview

b.      Explain how to answer the illegal question
When you got an illegal or inappropriate interview questions, be diplomatic in your self to response. You won't get hired if you misread the interviewer’s intentions and overreact when answer they question. On the other hand, they want to see how you handle delicate situations when they accept you. Give a brief answer to set limits to the topic and mention you’re happy to answer their question but aren’t sure how it relates to the job. That gives them a chance to explain themselves. And also stay confident to make them believe that you want to work for the company at all.



·        Chelsi Claudia              12614341
·        Eliska Tejaningtyas       13614504
·        Joti Sukma Elita D        15614712
·        Namira Setiawardani     17614792
·        Rahwillisvy                   18614824

Sabtu, 20 Mei 2017

CV


Application Letter



PT. Net Mediatama Indonesia
The East Tower
Jl. Lingkar Mega Kuningan Kav. E No.1 Lantai 27-30, Kuningan Timur
Jakarta Selatan, Kode Pos 12950
DKI Jakarta, Indonesia

May 21st, 2017
Dear Sir/Mrs,

I have read your advertisement at http://infokerjawa.blogspot.co.id/2016/09/lowongan-kerja-net-tv.html that is looking for journalist to hold some position. Based on the advertisement, I am interested to applying application for News Reporter position according my education background.
My name is Eliska Tejaningtyas. I have graduated from Gunadarma University majoring English Literature on July 2018. I consider myself that I have qualifications as you want. In addition, I possess good motivation for progress and growing , energetic, hard worker and eager to learn. Through my good organizational skills and my ability to work independent as well as in a teamwork situation. Beside that adequate computer skills. I would like express my gratitude for your attention and I hope I could follow your recruitment test.

Sincerely,

Eliska Tejaningtyas
 



Minggu, 14 Mei 2017

Negotiation in Business Communication Skills


Negotiation in Business Communication Skills!
1.  What is negotiation? 
            2. What are the negotiation styles? Explain? 
            3. Explain the negotiation process!
4. What are the characteristic of negotiation?
5.  Explain the positive and negative effect in negotiation!

Answers:
1      1. Negotiation is a discussion between two or  more people who are trying to work out a solution to their problem.

  2. There are some negotiation styles:

a. Avoiding
  • Primarily concerned with avoiding intra-personal conflict
  • Is useful when the the stakes of a negotiated outcome are not worth the investment of time or the potential for igniting conflict
  • Characterized by sidestepping, postponing, and ignoring the issue or situation
  • Effective when avoidance of the situation or issue does not greatly affect the relationship and short term task is not important to either party
b. Accommodating
  • Primarily concerned with the relationship between the parties
  • Easily gives the other side concessions in hopes of strengthening the relationship, but often gives away too much too soon
  • Tend to neglect their own needs in favor of helping the other side get what they want
  • Effective when long term relationship is important and short term task is not important
c. Compromising
  • The style falling between accommodating and competing
  • Useful when time is a concern or there is a strong relationship between the parties
  • Requires concessions from both sides to find agreement
  • Does not focus on legitimate or fair standards for settlement and instead utilizes “Meet in the middle,” or “Split the difference” solutions
d. Collaborating
  • Focuses on using problem solving methods to create value and discover mutually satisfactory agreements
  • Utilizes the creativity of both parties to find solutions to both sides’ interests
  • Tend to be assertive about their needs and cooperative with the other side
  • Effective when long term relationship is important and short term task is important
e. Competing
  • Primarily concerned with achieving their own goals regardless of the impact on others
  • Views negotiation as a win/lose rather than a problem solving activity
  • Often utilize manipulative tactics such as attacks, threats, and other aggressive behavior to achieve their objectives
  • Effective when long term relationship is not important and short term task is important
3    3. There are some negotiation process:

a. Planning your negotiation
  • set your objectives clearly in your own mind (including your minimum acceptable outcome, your anticipated outcome and your ideal outcome)
  • determine what you'll do if the negotiation, or a particular outcome, fails
  • determine your needs, the needs of the other party and the reasons behind them
  • list, rank and value your issues (and then consider concessions you might make)
  • analyse the other party (including their objectives and the information they need)
  • conduct research and consult with colleagues and partners
  • rehearse the negotiation
  • write an agenda - discussion topics, participants, location and schedule.
 
b. Engaging with the other party during the negotiation
  • Introduce yourself and articulate the agenda. Demonstrate calm confidence.
  • Propose - make your first offer. The other party will also make proposals. You should rarely accept their first offer. Evidence suggests that people who take the first proposal are less satisfied and regret their haste.
  • Check your understanding of the other party´s proposal.
  • Remember your objectives.
  • Discuss concepts and ideas.
  • Consider appropriate compromises, then make and seek concessions.
  • Suggest alternative proposals and listen to offered suggestions.
  • Paraphrase others' suggestions to clarify and acknowledge proposals.
  • Give and take.


c. Closing the negotiation
  • look for closing signals; for example
    • fading counter-arguments
    • tired body language from the other party
    • negotiating positions converging
  • articulate agreements and concessions already made
  • make 'closing' statements; for example
    • 'That suggestion might work.'
    • 'Right. Where do I sign?'
  • get agreements in writing as soon as you can
  • follow up promptly on any commitments you have made.

 4. There are some characteristics of negotiation:

a.       There are a minimum of two parties present in any negotiation.
b.      Both the parties have pre-determined goals which they wish to achieve.
c.       There is a clash of pre-determined goals, that is, some of the pre-determined goals are not shared by both the parties
d.      There is an expectation of outcome by both the parties in any negotiation.
e.       Both the parties believe the outcome of the negotiation to be satisfactory.
f.       Both parties are willing to compromise, that is, modify their position.
g.      The incompatibility of goals may make the modification of positions difficult.
h.      The parties understand the purpose of negotiation

5.      a. Positive Affect in Negotiation

Even before the negotiation process starts, people in a positive mood have more confidence and higher tendencies to plan to use a cooperative strategy. During the negotiation, negotiators who are in a positive mood tend to enjoy the interaction more, show less contentious behavior, use less aggressive tactics and more cooperative strategies. This in turn increases the likelihood that parties will reach their instrumental goals and enhance the ability to find integrative gains. Indeed, compared with negotiators with negative or natural affectivity, negotiators with positive affectivity reached more agreements and tended to honor those agreements more. Those favorable outcomes are due to better decision making processes, such as flexible thinking, creative problem solving, respect for others' perspectives, willingness to take risks and higher confidence. Post negotiation positive affect has beneficial consequences as well.

 

b. Negative Affect in Negotiation

                   Negative affect has detrimental effects on various stages in the negotiation process. us negative emotions affect negotiation outcomes, by far the most researched is anger. Angry negotiators plan to use more competitive strategies and to cooperate less, even before the negotiation starts. These competitive strategies are related to reduced joint outcomes. During negotiations, anger disrupts the process by reducing the level of trust, clouding parties' judgment, narrowing parties' focus of attention and changing their central goal from reaching agreement to retaliating against the other side. Angry negotiators pay less attention to opponent's interests and are less accurate in judging their interests, thus achieve lower joint gains.